VLT Class Action

What Is The VLT Class Action?

In 2012, the VLT Class Action was brought by Douglas Babstock and Fred Small against Atlantic Lottery Corporation Inc., a private business corporation in which Newfoundland and Labrador has a 25% shareholding. The class action is on behalf of all residents of Newfoundland and Labrador who have gambled on video lottery terminals.

Video lottery terminals, or VLTs, are a form of continuous electronic gambling. They differ from lotteries in that they are electronically programmed to create cognitive distortions of the perception of winning. These cognitive distortions are intended to keep the consumer engaged and losing money. The class action claims that VLTs are inherently deceptive, inherently addictive, and inherently dangerous when used as intended.

Plaintiffs believe that Atlantic Lotto knows or ought to know that VLTs are inherently deceptive, inherently addictive, and inherently dangerous when used as intended. Instead, it has embarked on a “responsible gaming strategy” with messages to consumers which place the onus of responsibility for control and the resulting harm from loss of control on consumers. The purpose of this message strategy is to blame consumers for problem gambling and divert attention from the fact that problem gambling is a natural result of design features of the VLT.

What Has Happened So Far In The VLT Class Action?

Certification determines whether the action can proceed as a class action, and is a very important event. Without certification as a class action, grouping together a large number of individual claims, the VLT case is impractical to be taken by any individual consumer and cannot be prosecuted.

The certification hearing was split into two stages. The first stage was argued on June 6 and 7, 2014 and plaintiffs won stage one about whether a cause of action is disclosed. The judge’s reasons were released on October 1, 2014.

The second stage of certification was heard at the end of September 2015, and involves whether a class action is the preferable procedure, and whether there are issues common to class members which will move the action forward once resolved. The decision is still on reserve with the motion judge.

Have You Been Affected By VLTs In Newfoundland And Labrador?

If you think you may be eligible to join the class action, please contact Patient Injury Law.


Mr. Crosbie was recommended to us by a friend a number of years ago when we were trying to find a lawyer to represent our daughter in a medical malpractice lawsuit. Based on that recommendation, we contacted Ches Crosbie to set up an appointment. We met with Mr. Crosbie and he took the time to review our case, explain the process and answered our many questions. It was immediately clear that Mr. Crosbie had the knowledge required to effectively pursue this type of medical malpractice lawsuit, and we elected to move forward to engage Mr. Crosbie and his team on our daughter's behalf. Mr. Crosbie kept us well informed throughout the entire process. We knew exactly what was happening with our daughter's lawsuit and what the next step was going to be at any given time. We were encouraged by Mr. Crosbie and his team to contact them any time for updates, or even if it was just to ask a simple question. It was very clear that Mr. Crosbie and his team had put a lot of effort into our daughter's lawsuit and this preparation was evident in how Mr. Crosbie was able to handle any situation that came up during the legal process. This preparation and dedication to the process helped lead to a successful outcome. It was a difficult time for our entire family and it was very comforting to know that our daughter's future was in good hands. We would recommend Mr. Crosbie and his team to anybody needing a knowledgeable, confident and professional legal service.
D.R. Head and Family